Tuesday, March 15, 2005

Definition: Tyranny

Following quote is courtesy of www.independentclearinghouse.com Thank you ICH!

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." James Madison. Federalist 47."

Thus, BushCo. And so what does a republic such as the United States do about tyranny? Isn't this something that BushCo would say requires "regime change"? And just what country is going to declare unilateral war to free us? We have a problem here. BushCo is determined to make sure the judiciary is in his hands, since he already controls majority of the legislative and all of the executive branches of our government.

"Our" government? Need to think about that a bit.

Lincoln stated a government Of the people, By the people, For the people. And what do we come up with? A tyranny. The people have done an incredibly stupid and self-defeating thing. We put a tyranny in power.

People like this: A TV show, "Street Smart" I believe, goes around asking people to fill in the blank with the correct word. So they ask this person A something like this: When people see another person acting as though he/she has no sense at all, they say, "He has......... in his belfry." And the word, person A gives is "bells". Or, What is the name of the famous intern in the White House Linda Tripp is famous for secretly taping? And person B says, "Bill Clinton".
Thus we end up a nation ruled by tyranny....voted in.

This is disgusting.
Wrap...

No comments: