Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Rove indictment...we wait for Fitz's timing...

From truthout.org :

Update on the Rove Indictment Story
By Marc Ash,
Wed May 17th, 2006 at 12:52:48 PM EDT
Fitzgerald Investigation

For the past few days, we have endured non-stop attacks on our credibility, and we have fought hard to defend our reputation. In addition, we have worked around the clock to provide additional information to our readership. People want to know more about this, and our job is to keep them informed. We take that responsibility seriously.

Here's what we now know: I spoke personally yesterday with both Rove's spokesman Mark Corallo and Rove's attorney Robert Luskin. Both men categorically denied all key points of our recent reporting on this issue. Both said, "Rove is not a target," "Rove did not inform the White House late last week that he would be indicted," and "Rove has not been indicted." Further, both Corallo and Luskin denied Leopold's account of events at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm that represents Karl Rove. They specifically stated again that no such meeting ever occurred, that Fitzgerald was not there, that Rove was not there, and that a major meeting did not take place. Both men were unequivocal on that point.

We can now report, however, that we have additional, independent sources that refute those denials by Corallo and Luskin. While we had only our own sources to work with in the beginning, additional sources have now come forward and offered corroboration to us.

We have been contacted by at least three reporters from mainstream media - network level organizations - who shared with us off-the-record confirmation and moral support. When we asked why they were not going public with this information, in each case they expressed frustration with superiors who would not allow it.

We also learned the following: The events at the office building that houses the law firm of Patton Boggs were not in fact a very well-guarded secret. Despite denials by Corallo and Luskin, there was intense activity at the office building. In fact, the building was staked out by at least two major network news crews. Further, although Corallo and Luskin are not prepared to talk about what happened in the offices of Patton Boggs, others emerging from the building were, both on background and off-the-record. There were a lot of talkers, and they confirmed our accounts. We do have more information, but want additional confirmation before going public with it.

THE 24 HOUR THING

We reported that Patrick Fitzgerald had, "instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his affairs in order...." That does not mean that at the end of that 24-hour period, Fitzgerald is obliged to hold a press conference and make an announcement. It just means that he has given Rove a 24-hour formal notification. Fitzgerald is not obliged to make an announcement at any point; he does so at his own discretion, and not if it compromises his case. So we're all stuck waiting here. Grab some coffee.

Wrap...

6 comments:

Patrick J. Fitzgerald said...

I will now bring Dick Cheney to his knees.

Watch 'n Wait said...

Mr beloved Fitzgerald...Please do not hesitate to do so, and the sooner the better!

Anonymous said...

I am shocked beyond belief. Are you sure that is really from him? (It seems to connect to what purports to be his Blog.) But that is the kind of a remark a prosecutor will rarely make before the event, and while he/she might say something like that to a few close friends, to say that publicly is a shocker.

If he did post that, I am worried that it could be used against him in those proceedings. It suggests a special prosecutor stepping outside of his "objective, impartial" role, outside of his "I call 'em as I see them, I do my job without prejudice or personal rancor toward anyone" position. You get an image of Fitz rubbing his hands in glee and saying (to flesh it out), "Now at last I'll bring that bastard Chaney to his knees." That makes me very nervous, and seems at best unprofessional. (Sort of like a judge saying from the bench, "Is that bastard Smith here for trial?") Sheesh. No one wants Cheney to take a fall, and a hard one, any more than I do--but a statement like that by the special prosecutor, if true, scares me. Ed

Watch 'n Wait said...

http://patrickjfitzgerald.blogspot.com/ There's the URL, Ed. And I'm sure it's not the real Fitzgerald....but whoever it is really did a job on that website. You'd swear it was, if it weren't such an outlandish idea.

Anonymous said...

The site posts articles that have already been made available to the public. I have not seen any remarks from PJF that were as direct as the one posted on this blog.

(They are usually more cryptic.)

I do not believe that PJF would state "I will now bring Dick Cheney to his knees." It is nowhere to be found on the PJF blog and it would definitely compromise his ongoing case.

Watch 'n Wait said...

Of course the real PJF would not, Anonymous. You're absolutely right. Read the comments above yours for disclaimers.